Why QPR Were Fined Rather Than Deducted Points

The following article was written by David Conn and appeared recently in the Guardian:

Details of the Alejandro Faurlin ruling show how lucrative life can be as a football agent. The 86-page document in which the FA-appointed regulatory commission has explained why it did not deduct points from Queen’s Park Rangers over the Alejandro Faurlin affair is, as is often in these cases, most interesting for the detail it illuminates than for the ins and outs of the disciplinary charges.

The commission found QPR not guilty of the most serious charges, that they played Faurlin throughout the 2009-10 season, and up to November 2010, when the player’s registration was “owned” not by the club itself, but by a third party, a company, TYP, registered in the US and run from Argentina. Being guilty of that would have carried severe penalties for the club, but the commission accepted their case that TYP had agreed to suspend their ownership rights throughout Faurlin’s first contract with QPR. The charge of misconduct against the club’s chairman at the time, Gianni Paladini, was found to be unproven.

The club was found guilty of not giving the FA all the documents relating to their agreement with TYP, which did have a serious impact – the FA said that had they known of TYP’s interest, they would have wanted the club to buy Faurlin outright. QPR said they would not have done so because the player was untried in England at that point, so the commission said QPR did gain a “sporting advantage” – having Faurlin play for them for free that first season and into November 2010 when they signed him permanently.

But the commission decided not to deduct points, which they stressed is the most drastic possible punishment, primarily because they found the club did not act in bad faith. They also heard from David Pleat, the former long-serving manager and now analyst for the Guardian among others, that a single player like Faurlin cannot determine a match on his own. “According to Mr Pleat, it is only in exceptional cases, and usually a goalscoring forward such as Lionel Messi, (or) Cristiano Ronaldo, that an individual player can be said to have a major effect on a team.”

QPR were instead fined £800,000, determined as the difference between what the club would have had to pay, £200,000, had they bought Faurlin in the summer of 2009, and the £1m he was worth after proving himself as a sterling player. QPR were also fined £75,000 for using an agent, the Italian Peppino Tirri, who was licensed by FIFA but not also registered and authorised by the FA at the time.

The written reasons released by the FA shine a light into third-party, commercial ownership of footballers’ registrations, which are said to be common in South America but were outlawed here following the Carlos Tevez-West Ham affair, when Tevez was owned by investors represented by Kia Joorabchian. Faurlin, the judgment says, was bought outright from his club, Instituto Cordoba, in Argentina’s second tier, for $250,000 on 15th August 2007 by the TYP Sports Agency, which is owned by an Argentinian businessman, Franco Tasco. Tirri, the agent, spotted Faurlin and told QPR about him in May 2009.

Crucially, the deal QPR did was to pay nothing at all for an initial three-year contract, and TYP agreed to suspend their economic rights for the course of that contract. The commission said it was “clearly false” of QPR to have described Faurlin’s signing on their website as “a ¬£3.5m deal”, when they paid nothing at the time, but said it was a matter of opinion whether that was “a lie”, or “a puff” to get the fans excited. Then after Faurlin performed well enough to be QPR’s 2009-10 player of the season, the club agreed to buy him from TYP for $1m (¬£615,000) – a $750,000 profit for Tasco, not for Cordoba. When they signed Faurlin outright in the summer of 2010 – the registration process went on until November 2010 – QPR paid Tirri ¬£200,000 as a finder’s fee.

So, what might have been a historic scandal, if points had been deducted and the champions denied promotion, was found to be a story of maladministration, a failure to send all the papers in. It has told us more about young footballers in South America being owned by businessmen rather than clubs, and the profits which can be made in that trade. And how lucrative being a football agent can be; £200,000 for spotting a player who proves himself good enough at a club in the Championship.

QPR, as a result of this decision, were allowed to go up to the Premier League, where ¬£45m average TV money will pour in. The club, nevertheless, hit a sour note by hiking season ticket prices, a reason given by the chairman, Amit Bhatia, for resigning saying he no longer agrees with the club’s direction.

In the middle of it all is Faurlin, the midfield worker, now 24, who arrived in West London from Cordoba at 22, his economic rights owned by the businessman, Tasco. Of Faurlin, the commission said: “The player, who has had the innocent misfortune to be at the eye of a storm surrounding him, was entirely straightforward and honest, we found.”

David Conn – The Guardian

4 thoughts on “Why QPR Were Fined Rather Than Deducted Points

  1. What pleases me is that no one has pointed the finger at the player throughout all of this and that he is described as “entirely straightforward and honest” by the FA.

    I’m not so sure those are words that I would use to describe others at the club though – ‘The commission said it was ‚Äúclearly false‚Äù of QPR to have described Faurlin‚Äôs signing on their website as ‚Äúa ¬£3.5m deal‚Äù, when they paid nothing at the time, but said it was a matter of opinion whether that was ‚Äúa lie‚Äù, or ‚Äúa puff‚Äù to get the fans excited.’ Mmmmmmmm……

  2. I’ve been drinking and I couldn’t quite be bothered to read the whole article. But I thank you. I love the David Pleat bit. On a general point, no son just stop drinking, I am absolutely furious that Norwich and Swansea will go up with a plan. Norwich have signed James Vaughan, they will have an amount of money and a wage bill and considering their next sensible signing. We are stuck. We have these lunatics who know nothing about football so all we will get is short-term gimmicks, loan signings. I feel sorry for Neil and as fans we deserve better than this.

  3. In any case, I’m not sure David Pleat is right. By my calculations, Faurlin earned us 14.57289 points last season, his errors cost us only 4.07135 points and that’s why we got promoted.

Comments are closed.